Which one of these management styles requires the employer to be heavily involved by setting a personal example?

The pace-setting management style is characterized by a leader who sets high performance standards and exemplifies the behaviors and attitudes they expect from their team. This style requires the employer to take an active role in demonstrating these standards, often leading by personal example. When a manager adopts a pace-setting approach, they typically outline clear, ambitious goals and rely on their own performance as a benchmark for the team's efforts.

This style can be effective in environments where team members are highly skilled and motivated because it encourages productivity by showcasing excellence. The leader's direct involvement not only sets a standard but also provides a clear model for team members to emulate.

In contrast, other management styles differ in their approach. The authoritative style focuses on providing a vision and direction without necessarily setting a personal example; it emphasizes decisiveness and guiding the team towards a common goal. The democratic style prioritizes team input and consensus building, encouraging participation from all members rather than leading through personal example. Laissez-faire management takes a hands-off approach, allowing team members considerable autonomy without direct involvement from the leader in setting examples. Thus, the defining characteristic of a pace-setting style is its emphasis on personal involvement and modeling.